Skip to content

feat: conform to 6265bis#31

Merged
anzharip merged 1 commit intodevfrom
feat/conform-to-6265bis
Aug 6, 2022
Merged

feat: conform to 6265bis#31
anzharip merged 1 commit intodevfrom
feat/conform-to-6265bis

Conversation

@anzharip
Copy link
Owner

@anzharip anzharip commented Aug 6, 2022

Conform to 6265bis.
If the name-value-pair string lacks a %x3D ("=") character,
then the name string is empty,
and the value string is the value of name-value-pair.

rfc6265bis rev 10
Ref: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-10

Conform to 6265bis.
If the name-value-pair string lacks a %x3D ("=") character,
then the name string is empty,
and the value string is the value of name-value-pair.

rfc6265bis rev 10
Ref: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-10
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 6, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #31 (8271c99) into dev (18fc752) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               dev       #31   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines           52        52           
  Branches         4         4           
=========================================
  Hits            52        52           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@anzharip anzharip merged commit cf9b60a into dev Aug 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant