Skip to content

[Improvement] Support filter by status and type when show table optimizing process#3230

Merged
baiyangtx merged 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
baiyangtx:query-optimizing-status
Sep 29, 2024
Merged

[Improvement] Support filter by status and type when show table optimizing process#3230
baiyangtx merged 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
baiyangtx:query-optimizing-status

Conversation

@baiyangtx
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why are the changes needed?

To support filter of optimizing type and status when show table optimizing process list.

Brief change log

  • Add filter selection in WebUI
  • Add filter status in TableDescriptorAPI
  • Implement the filter in Mixed/Iceberg/Paimon/Hudi descriptor
  • Add RESTAPI to get table process type for different format.

How was this patch tested?

  • Add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible

  • Add screenshots for manual tests if appropriate

  • Run test locally before making a pull request

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)

…zing process

(cherry picked from commit 80ad146b9007115a40b1ab6c4dee9c492b02d71c)
@github-actions github-actions bot added module:ams-server Ams server module module:ams-dashboard Ams dashboard module module:common labels Sep 27, 2024
@baiyangtx
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

It looks like this.

image

And fetch process-type from backend

image

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@zhangmo8 zhangmo8 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@baiyangtx baiyangtx requested a review from zhangmo8 September 29, 2024 11:35
@baiyangtx baiyangtx merged commit 967eea2 into apache:master Sep 29, 2024
@baiyangtx baiyangtx deleted the query-optimizing-status branch September 29, 2024 11:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants