[AMORO-3552] Optimize binary distribution NOTICE&LICENSE file

[zhoujinsong]

Why are the changes needed?

Close #3552.

Brief change log

• as titled.

How was this patch tested?

• Add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible

• Add screenshots for manual tests if appropriate

• Run test locally before making a pull request

Documentation

• Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
• If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)

[klion26]

@zhoujinsong thanks for the contribution, left some inline comments, please let me know what you think about it.

[klion26]

IIUC, we don't need to mention the ASF project here?

- binary distribution NOTICE should content the NOTICE from ALv2
project (non ASF), for instance Jackson, AWS SDK, Netty, etc. That
would be great to double check that for next releases.

[klion26]

And we can remove the ASF project listed in the NOTICE file

- NOTICE is OK. Nit: the NOTICE can be lighter: no need to mention the
ASF projects here (Iceberg, Paimon, Flink)

[zhoujinsong]

Yes, it is fine to exclude the ASF projects, but I still prefer to include it here, like many other projects did:

• https://github.com/apache/gravitino/blob/main/NOTICE.bin
• https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/NOTICE-binary

Besides, some projects did not like:

• https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/NOTICE

[klion26]

I'm fine with either way, but as the asf website said, so maybe removing the ASF project here is better.

It is important to keep NOTICE as brief and simple as possible, as each addition places a burden on downstream consumers.

**Do not** add anything to NOTICE which is not legally required.

[zhoujinsong]

Make sense to me, I will remove the ASF projects.

[zhoujinsong]

@klion26 I have removed the ASF projects here, PTAL.

[klion26]

@zhoujinsong thanks for the update, LGTM