Remove sql-on-pandas/polars/cudf examples #602
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
Author
|
@jdye64 I'm guessing that you don't have time to maintain these examples either right now, but let me know if that is not the case. |
andygrove
force-pushed
the
remove-sql-on-x-examples
branch
from
f521c25 to
238c69d
Compare
Contributor
|
Hey @andygrove yeah I just don't have the bandwidth for that now. I agree it is a good idea to remove those examples |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #585 (sort of)
Rationale for this change
The examples for transpiling DataFusion query plans to run with other execution libraries, such as Polars, Pandas, and cuDF, have not been maintained and no longer work.
Given the lack of active maintainers, I propose that we remove these examples.
What changes are included in this PR?
Are there any user-facing changes?