Skip to content

XX#10484

Closed
sunjincheng121 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
sunjincheng121:BEAM-7951-MulInputs
Closed

XX#10484
sunjincheng121 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
sunjincheng121:BEAM-7951-MulInputs

Conversation

@sunjincheng121
Copy link
Member

In this PR would address multiple inputs/outputs for wire coder settings as suggested in #9979

Post-Commit Tests Status (on master branch)

Lang SDK Apex Dataflow Flink Gearpump Samza Spark
Go Build Status --- --- Build Status --- --- Build Status
Java Build Status Build Status Build Status Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status Build Status Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Python Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
--- Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
--- --- Build Status
XLang --- --- --- Build Status --- --- ---

Pre-Commit Tests Status (on master branch)

--- Java Python Go Website
Non-portable Build Status Build Status
Build Status
Build Status Build Status
Portable --- Build Status --- ---

See .test-infra/jenkins/README for trigger phrase, status and link of all Jenkins jobs.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @lukecwik. Do you think we should add the WireCoderSetting property for each input and output edge explicitly in the proto?
I was thinking the setting is not a necessary properties for each edge so added the wire_coder_settings as an ExecutableStage level property. The wire_coder_settings can be an empty list.
What do you think?

@sunjincheng121
Copy link
Member Author

I have rebase the code.

@sunjincheng121 sunjincheng121 changed the title [BEAM-7951] Improve the docs for beam_runner_api.proto and WindowedVa… XX Dec 31, 2019
@sunjincheng121 sunjincheng121 deleted the BEAM-7951-MulInputs branch December 31, 2019 05:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant