Skip to content

[BEAM-886] Remove the usage of OldDoFn and clean up function names#1917

Merged
asfgit merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
sb2nov:BEAM-886-remove-oldDoFn-6
Feb 6, 2017
Merged

[BEAM-886] Remove the usage of OldDoFn and clean up function names#1917
asfgit merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
sb2nov:BEAM-886-remove-oldDoFn-6

Conversation

@sb2nov
Copy link
Contributor

@sb2nov sb2nov commented Feb 4, 2017

Be sure to do all of the following to help us incorporate your contribution
quickly and easily:

  • Make sure the PR title is formatted like:
    [BEAM-<Jira issue #>] Description of pull request
  • Make sure tests pass via mvn clean verify. (Even better, enable
    Travis-CI on your fork and ensure the whole test matrix passes).
  • Replace <Jira issue #> in the title with the actual Jira issue
    number, if there is one.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache
    Individual Contributor License Agreement.

R: @aaltay PTAL

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.01%) to 69.691% when pulling f7208f7 on sb2nov:BEAM-886-remove-oldDoFn-6 into 6e220bb on apache:master.

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Feb 4, 2017

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PreCommit_Java_MavenInstall/7079/
--none--

Copy link
Member

@aaltay aaltay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @sb2nov. I added one comment.

cdef ScopedMetricsContainer scoped_metrics_container
cdef list side_inputs
cdef bint has_windowed_side_inputs
cdef bint windowed_inputs
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Name this has_windowed_inputs maybe, because it still a boolean and not a list of inputs.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

@sb2nov sb2nov force-pushed the BEAM-886-remove-oldDoFn-6 branch from f7208f7 to e9e4d56 Compare February 5, 2017 19:14
@sb2nov
Copy link
Contributor Author

sb2nov commented Feb 5, 2017

Thanks. @aaltay PTAL

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Feb 5, 2017

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PreCommit_Java_MavenInstall/7092/

Build result: ABORTED

[...truncated 8343 lines...] ... 31 moreCaused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: The forked VM terminated without properly saying goodbye. VM crash or System.exit called?Command was /bin/sh -c cd /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/beam_PreCommit_Java_MavenInstall/sdks/java/harness && /usr/local/asfpackages/java/jdk1.8.0_102/jre/bin/java org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/beam_PreCommit_Java_MavenInstall/sdks/java/harness/target/surefire/surefire5463691601590839566tmp /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/beam_PreCommit_Java_MavenInstall/sdks/java/harness/target/surefire/surefire_162472903609076173860tmp at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.booterclient.ForkStarter.fork(ForkStarter.java:590) at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.booterclient.ForkStarter.fork(ForkStarter.java:460) at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.booterclient.ForkStarter.run(ForkStarter.java:229) at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.booterclient.ForkStarter.run(ForkStarter.java:201) at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.AbstractSurefireMojo.executeProvider(AbstractSurefireMojo.java:1026) at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.AbstractSurefireMojo.executeAfterPreconditionsChecked(AbstractSurefireMojo.java:862) at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.AbstractSurefireMojo.execute(AbstractSurefireMojo.java:755) at org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultBuildPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultBuildPluginManager.java:134) ... 32 more2017-02-05T20:54:40.186 [ERROR] 2017-02-05T20:54:40.186 [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.2017-02-05T20:54:40.186 [ERROR] 2017-02-05T20:54:40.186 [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles:2017-02-05T20:54:40.186 [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/PluginExecutionException2017-02-05T20:54:40.187 [ERROR] 2017-02-05T20:54:40.187 [ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the command2017-02-05T20:54:40.187 [ERROR] mvn -rf :beam-sdks-java-harnessBuild was abortedchannel stoppedSetting status of e9e4d56 to FAILURE with url https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PreCommit_Java_MavenInstall/7092/ and message: 'Build finished. 'Using context: Jenkins: Maven clean install
--none--

@sb2nov
Copy link
Contributor Author

sb2nov commented Feb 5, 2017

retest this please

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Feb 5, 2017

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PreCommit_Java_MavenInstall/7093/

Build result: ABORTED

[...truncated 8343 lines...] ... 31 moreCaused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: The forked VM terminated without properly saying goodbye. VM crash or System.exit called?Command was /bin/sh -c cd /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/beam_PreCommit_Java_MavenInstall/sdks/java/harness && /usr/local/asfpackages/java/jdk1.8.0_102/jre/bin/java org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/beam_PreCommit_Java_MavenInstall/sdks/java/harness/target/surefire/surefire2508099028197844684tmp /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/beam_PreCommit_Java_MavenInstall/sdks/java/harness/target/surefire/surefire_163795127696367831041tmp at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.booterclient.ForkStarter.fork(ForkStarter.java:590) at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.booterclient.ForkStarter.fork(ForkStarter.java:460) at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.booterclient.ForkStarter.run(ForkStarter.java:229) at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.booterclient.ForkStarter.run(ForkStarter.java:201) at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.AbstractSurefireMojo.executeProvider(AbstractSurefireMojo.java:1026) at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.AbstractSurefireMojo.executeAfterPreconditionsChecked(AbstractSurefireMojo.java:862) at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.AbstractSurefireMojo.execute(AbstractSurefireMojo.java:755) at org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultBuildPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultBuildPluginManager.java:134) ... 32 more2017-02-05T23:14:03.821 [ERROR] 2017-02-05T23:14:03.821 [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.2017-02-05T23:14:03.821 [ERROR] 2017-02-05T23:14:03.821 [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles:2017-02-05T23:14:03.821 [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/PluginExecutionException2017-02-05T23:14:03.821 [ERROR] 2017-02-05T23:14:03.821 [ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the command2017-02-05T23:14:03.821 [ERROR] mvn -rf :beam-sdks-java-harnessBuild was abortedchannel stoppedSetting status of e9e4d56 to FAILURE with url https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PreCommit_Java_MavenInstall/7093/ and message: 'Build finished. 'Using context: Jenkins: Maven clean install
--none--

@aaltay
Copy link
Member

aaltay commented Feb 5, 2017

LGTM. Could you re-run the tests? Let's make sure at least one of them is green.

@sb2nov sb2nov force-pushed the BEAM-886-remove-oldDoFn-6 branch from e9e4d56 to 137d392 Compare February 6, 2017 00:02
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 69.695% when pulling 137d392 on sb2nov:BEAM-886-remove-oldDoFn-6 into 4d0e8ec on apache:master.

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Feb 6, 2017

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PreCommit_Java_MavenInstall/7094/
--none--

@asfgit asfgit merged commit 137d392 into apache:master Feb 6, 2017
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2017
@sb2nov sb2nov deleted the BEAM-886-remove-oldDoFn-6 branch February 6, 2017 02:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants