Skip to content

fixed problem when client id is not set#2219

Closed
hepeknet wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
hepeknet:mqttIOFix
Closed

fixed problem when client id is not set#2219
hepeknet wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
hepeknet:mqttIOFix

Conversation

@hepeknet
Copy link

@hepeknet hepeknet commented Mar 10, 2017

Be sure to do all of the following to help us incorporate your contribution
quickly and easily:

  • Make sure the PR title is formatted like:
    [BEAM-1686] Added random client id assignment
  • Make sure tests pass via mvn clean verify. (Even better, enable
    Travis-CI on your fork and ensure the whole test matrix passes).
  • Replace <Jira issue #> in the title with the actual Jira issue
    number, if there is one.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache
    Individual Contributor License Agreement.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.003%) to 70.168% when pulling b3bd691 on hepeknet:mqttIOFix into 2c2424c on apache:master.

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Mar 10, 2017

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PreCommit_Java_MavenInstall/8322/
--none--

@hepeknet
Copy link
Author

not sure why coverage decreased.. I did add new test for case when client id is not set. Previously code would throw NPE when client id was not set directly.

@tibkiss
Copy link
Contributor

tibkiss commented Mar 10, 2017

Could you please create a tracking JIRA stating the problem this PR solves?

@hepeknet
Copy link
Author

@jbonofre
Copy link
Member

R: @jbonofre

Copy link
Member

@jbonofre jbonofre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, even if clientId should always be defined by user.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 818fc94 Mar 10, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants