Skip to content

Comments

[BEAM-1579] Remove single-matcher replacement API#2424

Closed
tgroh wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
tgroh:remove_replace_single
Closed

[BEAM-1579] Remove single-matcher replacement API#2424
tgroh wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
tgroh:remove_replace_single

Conversation

@tgroh
Copy link
Member

@tgroh tgroh commented Apr 4, 2017

Be sure to do all of the following to help us incorporate your contribution
quickly and easily:

  • Make sure the PR title is formatted like:
    [BEAM-<Jira issue #>] Description of pull request
  • Make sure tests pass via mvn clean verify. (Even better, enable
    Travis-CI on your fork and ensure the whole test matrix passes).
  • Replace <Jira issue #> in the title with the actual Jira issue
    number, if there is one.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache
    Individual Contributor License Agreement.

This makes it more difficult for runner authors to use the discouraged
API that doesn't validate ordering of replacements.

This makes it more difficult for runner authors to use the discouraged
API that doesn't validate ordering of replacements.
@tgroh
Copy link
Member Author

tgroh commented Apr 4, 2017

R: @jkff

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.003%) to 70.021% when pulling 47c0a09 on tgroh:remove_replace_single into 22ff898 on apache:master.

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Apr 4, 2017

Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PreCommit_Java_MavenInstall/9131/
--none--

Copy link
Contributor

@jkff jkff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM for self-merge.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 4b69d24 Apr 5, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants