Fix #37736: Allow composite transforms to use implicit input chaining#37860
Fix #37736: Allow composite transforms to use implicit input chaining#37860liferoad wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
…ms/util.py Replace root logger calls (logging.info, logging.warning, etc.) with a module-level named logger (_LOGGER = logging.getLogger(__name__)) in apache_beam.transforms.util. This allows sdk_harness_log_level_overrides to properly control log levels for this module.
…aining When a composite transform has no explicit inputs/outputs on its sub-transforms, automatically chain them similar to how 'chain' type transforms work. This allows composite transforms to be used as middle transforms without requiring explicit inputs for each sub-transform. Added test_composite_implicit_input_chaining to verify the fix.
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the usability of Apache Beam's YAML composite transforms by introducing implicit input chaining. Previously, composite transforms required explicit input/output definitions for each sub-transform, which could be verbose. With this change, users can now define a sequence of sub-transforms within a composite without specifying inputs and outputs, and the system will automatically pass the output of one transform as the input to the next, streamlining the definition of complex pipelines. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
Issue
#37736
When using
type: compositein Beam YAML, each sub-transform requires an explicitinput, unliketype: chainwhich automatically passes the output of one transform to the next.Fix
Modified
expand_composite_transform()insdks/python/apache_beam/yaml/yaml_transform.pyto automatically chain sub-transforms when no explicit inputs/outputs are specified, similar to howchaintype transforms work.Testing
Added
test_composite_implicit_input_chainingtest case inyaml_transform_test.pyto verify the fix.