Optimze away WindmillWatermarkHold::clear when the cached hold is empty#38297
Optimze away WindmillWatermarkHold::clear when the cached hold is empty#38297arunpandianp wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
|
R: @scwhittle |
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a performance optimization for the WindmillWatermarkHold class by preventing redundant operations when the watermark hold is already cleared. By adding an early return check, the system avoids unnecessary processing and state modifications, improving efficiency in scenarios where clear() is called on an empty state. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. Footnotes
|
|
Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment |
|
StreamingDataflowWorkerTest tests fail due to problems with mocks, looking into fixing them. |
|
|
||
| @Override | ||
| public void clear() { | ||
| if (cachedValue != null && !cachedValue.isPresent() && localAdditions == null) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How about:
localAdditions = null;
if (cachedValue == null || cachedValue.isPresent()) {
cleared = true;
cachedValue = Optional.absent();
}
no reason to not skip sending backend clear if there were localadditions
No description provided.