Skip to content

Avoid RequestResponseIO throttler access when throttler is absent#39109

Closed
hoang-shyftplan wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
hoang-shyftplan:fix/requestresponse-non-throttler-success
Closed

Avoid RequestResponseIO throttler access when throttler is absent#39109
hoang-shyftplan wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
hoang-shyftplan:fix/requestresponse-non-throttler-success

Conversation

@hoang-shyftplan

@hoang-shyftplan hoang-shyftplan commented Jun 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Description

  • Guard the post-call success throttler metric callback in _CallDoFn with the same _throttler presence check used for pre-call throttling.
  • Prevent crashes when RequestResponseIO is used with no throttler / non-default throttling path.
  • This addresses the reported AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'throttler' on successful calls.

Testing

Not run (no test execution requested).

@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a runtime crash in RequestResponseIO that occurs when a throttler is not configured. By ensuring the throttler is present before attempting to record successful request metrics, the implementation becomes more robust against non-default throttling configurations.

Highlights

  • Throttler safety check: Added a conditional check for the existence of the throttler object before accessing it in the successful request callback to prevent potential AttributeError exceptions.
New Features

🧠 You can now enable Memory (public preview) to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize the Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counterproductive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a safety check in sdks/python/apache_beam/io/requestresponse.py to ensure self._throttler is defined before calling successful_request. The reviewer recommended using an explicit is not None check instead of implicit truthiness to comply with PEP 8 style guidelines.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

Comment on lines +378 to +379
if self._throttler:
self._throttler.throttler.successful_request(req_time * MSEC_TO_SEC)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

According to PEP 8, comparisons to singletons like None should always be done with is or is not, never the equality operators or implicit truthiness checks, especially when testing whether an optional variable or argument that defaults to None was set. Using is not None is safer and more explicit.

Suggested change
if self._throttler:
self._throttler.throttler.successful_request(req_time * MSEC_TO_SEC)
if self._throttler is not None:
self._throttler.throttler.successful_request(req_time * MSEC_TO_SEC)
References
  1. PEP 8: Comparisons to singletons like None should always be done with 'is' or 'is not', never the equality operators. Also, beware of writing 'if x' when you really mean 'if x is not None'. (link)

@hoang-shyftplan hoang-shyftplan deleted the fix/requestresponse-non-throttler-success branch June 25, 2026 17:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants