[CALCITE-4949] Evaluate if using org.codelibs is appropriate for an Elasticsearch painless dependency#2650
Open
ILuffZhe wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
Open
[CALCITE-4949] Evaluate if using org.codelibs is appropriate for an Elasticsearch painless dependency#2650ILuffZhe wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
ILuffZhe wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
vlsi
reviewed
Dec 18, 2021
…lasticsearch painless dependency
ILuffZhe
force-pushed
the
CALCITE-4949
branch
from
e2884ec to
fa35971
Compare
NobiGo
added
the
LGTM-will-merge-soon
julianhyde
force-pushed
the
main
branch
2 times, most recently
from
8a5cf83 to
cf7f71b
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds some old comments and removes "scripting-painless-spi" dependency, which is included in "lang-painless".