added support for STRING_AGG function with collation#3076
added support for STRING_AGG function with collation#3076Kowsikraja wants to merge 1255 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
…park_td_datetime_extract_fns
…ETL and Starling TC fixes
…ETL_Starling_TC_Fixed RAV 9189 Add Qualify support for etl and starling tc fixed
Support for Teradata -> Spark Datetime extract functions
Spark date_add and date_sub to binary operators
…AVHIBQ-83_feature_branch_for_field_access_enhancement
…ahidhar/spark_to_date_fn
* spark time operations
…ahidhar/spark_to_date_fn
spark to_date support
…AVTDBQ_117_Support_for_Hashrow_with_multiple_arguments
…AVHIBQ-83_feature_branch_for_field_access_enhancement
chunweilei
left a comment
chunweilei
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Kowsikraja It seems you pushed the wrong project.
…EXT_DAY to TIMEDATE
|
It seems that your code is not based on the main branch of calcite, so there are so many changes in this PR |
…d_NEXT_DAY_Function RTP_175 / Added support for NEXT_DAY Function
…d_NEXT_DAY_Function RTP_175 / L2 - fixed import *
…l_with_function_as_operand RNBS-1116: Updated Condition to resolve Interval Operand
…owsikraja/string_agg_agg_fun_fix � Conflicts: � core/src/test/java/org/apache/calcite/rel/rel2sql/RelToSqlConverterTest.java
…d_NEXT_DAY_Function Rushikesh.sapate/rtp 175 added next day function
…owsikraja/string_agg_agg_fun_fix
julianhyde
force-pushed
the
main
branch
2 times, most recently
from
8a5cf83 to
cf7f71b
Compare
|
This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 90 days if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pull request requires a review, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can revive the PR at any time and @mention a reviewer or discuss it on the dev@calcite.apache.org list. Thank you for your contributions. |
|
This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 90 days if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pull request requires a review, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can revive the PR at any time and @mention a reviewer or discuss it on the dev@calcite.apache.org list. Thank you for your contributions. |
20 participants
No description provided.