Skip to content

[CALCITE-2468] Fix Validator IndexOutOfBoundsException when trying to infer operand type from a struct return type#932

Closed
walterddr wants to merge 4 commits intoapache:masterfrom
walterddr:CALCITE-2468
Closed

[CALCITE-2468] Fix Validator IndexOutOfBoundsException when trying to infer operand type from a struct return type#932
walterddr wants to merge 4 commits intoapache:masterfrom
walterddr:CALCITE-2468

Conversation

@walterddr
Copy link

@zinking
Copy link
Contributor

zinking commented Dec 5, 2018

change looks good, could you squeeze the commits into 1?

julianhyde added a commit to julianhyde/calcite that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2018
…trying to infer operand type from struct return type (Rong Rong)

Close apache#932
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 40d12b7 Dec 6, 2018
F21 pushed a commit to F21/calcite that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2019
… to infer operand type from STRUCT return type (Rong Rong)

Add example in server module's type.iq test.
Fix type inference when operator is AS with a complex row of just 1 element.

Close apache#932
zhztheplayer pushed a commit to zhztheplayer/calcite that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2019
… to infer operand type from STRUCT return type (Rong Rong)

Add example in server module's type.iq test.
Fix type inference when operator is AS with a complex row of just 1 element.

Close apache#932
wangxlong pushed a commit to wangxlong/calcite that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2020
… to infer operand type from STRUCT return type (Rong Rong)

Add example in server module's type.iq test.
Fix type inference when operator is AS with a complex row of just 1 element.

Close apache#932
jamesstarr pushed a commit to jamesstarr/calcite that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2026
… to infer operand type from STRUCT return type (Rong Rong)

Add example in server module's type.iq test.
Fix type inference when operator is AS with a complex row of just 1 element.

Close apache#932

Change-Id: Ib04b0e89411678bf9c70663b9ecea71a0e7e37f0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants