Skip to content

Conversation

@squakez
Copy link
Contributor

@squakez squakez commented Dec 11, 2025

Description

Target

  • I checked that the commit is targeting the correct branch (Camel 4 uses the main branch)

Tracking

  • If this is a large change, bug fix, or code improvement, I checked there is a JIRA issue filed for the change (usually before you start working on it).

Apache Camel coding standards and style

  • I checked that each commit in the pull request has a meaningful subject line and body.
  • I have run mvn clean install -DskipTests locally from root folder and I have committed all auto-generated changes.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🌟 Thank you for your contribution to the Apache Camel project! 🌟

🤖 CI automation will test this PR automatically.

🐫 Apache Camel Committers, please review the following items:

  • First-time contributors require MANUAL approval for the GitHub Actions to run

  • You can use the command /component-test (camel-)component-name1 (camel-)component-name2.. to request a test from the test bot.

  • You can label PRs using build-all, build-dependents, skip-tests and test-dependents to fine-tune the checks executed by this PR.

  • Build and test logs are available in the Summary page. Only Apache Camel committers have access to the summary.

  • ⚠️ Be careful when sharing logs. Review their contents before sharing them publicly.

@squakez squakez requested a review from oscerd December 11, 2025 10:48
@squakez squakez marked this pull request as draft December 11, 2025 11:50
@squakez squakez force-pushed the fix/class_name_check_engine branch from dcb873f to bb20627 Compare December 12, 2025 07:57
@squakez squakez marked this pull request as ready for review December 12, 2025 07:58
@squakez squakez merged commit c7e151a into apache:main Dec 12, 2025
4 checks passed
@squakez squakez deleted the fix/class_name_check_engine branch December 12, 2025 09:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants