feat(components): support telemetry include patterns

[squakez]

Closes CAMEL-23433

Description

Target

• I checked that the commit is targeting the correct branch (Camel 4 uses the main branch)

Tracking

• If this is a large change, bug fix, or code improvement, I checked there is a JIRA issue filed for the change (usually before you start working on it).

Apache Camel coding standards and style

• I checked that each commit in the pull request has a meaningful subject line and body.

• I have run mvn clean install -DskipTests locally from root folder and I have committed all auto-generated changes.

[ghost]

🌟 Thank you for your contribution to the Apache Camel project! 🌟
🤖 CI automation will test this PR automatically.

🐫 Apache Camel Committers, please review the following items:

• First-time contributors require MANUAL approval for the GitHub Actions to run
• You can use the command /component-test (camel-)component-name1 (camel-)component-name2.. to request a test from the test bot although they are normally detected and executed by CI.
• You can label PRs using skip-tests and test-dependents to fine-tune the checks executed by this PR.
• Build and test logs are available in the summary page. Only Apache Camel committers have access to the summary.

⚠️ Be careful when sharing logs. Review their contents before sharing them publicly.

[ghost]

🧪 CI tested the following changed modules:

• catalog/camel-catalog
• components/camel-micrometer-observability
• components/camel-opentelemetry2
• components/camel-telemetry-dev
• components/camel-telemetry
• core/camel-main

ℹ️ Dependent modules were not tested because the total number of affected modules exceeded the threshold (50). Use the test-dependents label to force testing all dependents.

Build reactor — dependencies compiled but only changed modules were tested (6 modules)

• Camel :: Catalog :: Camel Catalog
• Camel :: Common Telemetry
• Camel :: Main
• Camel :: Micrometer :: Observability 2
• Camel :: Opentelemetry 2
• Camel :: Telemetry :: Dev

---

⚙️ View full build and test results

[squakez]

@davsclaus @oscerd @Croway please, have a look. As soon as it is merged I need to work on the runtimes as well. Thanks!

[Croway]

what happen when excludePatterns and includePatterns are used together? exclude should win, do you think it is worth documenting this behaviour? @squakez

[squakez]

Pertinent question. However I think it is an implicit logic. If you include "a" and exclude "a", then you logically won't have "a". Also, I've added the "If nothing is specified, all processors are included by default" right to clarify that everything is included by default.