NODEJS-691 Fix generated timestamp on retry#438
Merged
absurdfarce merged 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom Oct 1, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
Note: this PR is in reference to NODEJS-691 |
Contributor
|
I agree that this is an issue (and a pretty significant one) but I'm inclined to say we should address it at a different spot. More details can be found on NODJES-691; I'd like to keep the conversation going there as much as possible since this issue isn't actually constrained to the code being modified here. |
Contributor
|
Agree with @SiyaoIsHiding; this looks right to me. Test run with these changes was as expected so I think we're good to go here! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello @absurdfarce,
There is an issue with timestamps generated by timestamp generators in
DefaultExecutionOptions.No matter if the request is prepared or not, any retry, including speculative execution, will generate a new timestamp for the query when starting a new execution for the same request object.
As interpreted by Cassandra, the latest timestamp take precedence. Then, queries executed and marked as successful can be overwritten by past queries when retrying the execution.
The user feels that it is a retry but in fact, it is a new query.
This is done by the
WriteQueuewhen callingrequest.write(...)which callwriteQueryParameters(...)and thengetOrGenerateTimestamp()which always generate a new timestamp for each new execution. It should generate one and use it for each consecutive calls to make a retry operation in Cassandra.I did not write any tests for this change since I don't have a proper setup and configuration on my side which cause tests to fail. I think testing on the client side only, like this is enough:
Thank you very much,
Have a good day,
Luc