Skip to content

Comments

[CELEBORN-1804] Shuffle environment metrics of RemoteShuffleEnvironment should use Shuffle.Remote metric group#3032

Closed
SteNicholas wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
SteNicholas:CELEBORN-1804
Closed

[CELEBORN-1804] Shuffle environment metrics of RemoteShuffleEnvironment should use Shuffle.Remote metric group#3032
SteNicholas wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
SteNicholas:CELEBORN-1804

Conversation

@SteNicholas
Copy link
Member

@SteNicholas SteNicholas commented Dec 25, 2024

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Shuffle environment metrics of RemoteShuffleEnvironment should use Shuffle.Remote metric group.

Why are the changes needed?

Shuffle environment metrics of RemoteShuffleEnvironment uses incorrect netty metric group defined as Shuffle.Netty. Therefore, RemoteShuffleEnvironment should use remote metric group like Shuffle.Remote for shuffle environment metrics.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

CI.

@apache apache deleted a comment from reswqa Dec 25, 2024
@SteNicholas SteNicholas force-pushed the CELEBORN-1804 branch 2 times, most recently from 70dbdb4 to 71151ba Compare December 25, 2024 12:42
@SteNicholas SteNicholas requested a review from reswqa December 25, 2024 12:43
@SteNicholas SteNicholas changed the title [CELEBORN-1804] Task level metric group structure of RemoteShuffleEnvironment should use Shuffle.Remote.<Input|Output>.Buffers [CELEBORN-1804] Shuffle environment metrics of RemoteShuffleEnvironment should use Shuffle.Remote metric group Dec 26, 2024
@SteNicholas
Copy link
Member Author

@reswqa, @codenohup, RequestedMemoryUsageMetric is introduced in Flink 1.15. Meanwhile, the implementation of RequestedMemoryUsageMetric is different between Flink 1.15 and other version. Therefore, it's blocked by #3029 to move RequestedMemoryUsageMetric to common module.

Copy link
Member

@reswqa reswqa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@reswqa reswqa closed this in 56019c7 Dec 31, 2024
@reswqa
Copy link
Member

reswqa commented Dec 31, 2024

Merged to main(v0.6.0)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants