-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
server: find suitable disk offering for volume upload #5852
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Fixes apache#5696 Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@shwstppr a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 2178 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@sureshanaparti a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
code looks good so far, @shwstppr How far is this from done? |
|
@DaanHoogland I was not able to test a multi-zone setup yet. Also, I was not sure if it will correct to use a different custom offering as default other than one with unique_name=Cloud.com-Custom. So would like other's opinion. |
|
The offering name should not matter. Let me know when this is ready for review. |
|
Trillian test result (tid-2862)
|
@DaanHoogland uploadVolume API does have a param to specify diskoffering. Creating a new offering during volume upload itself in the UI won't make a lot of sense as disk offering creation by default is not allowed to default User role. |
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@shwstppr a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 2340 |
DaanHoogland
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tested LGTM
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@shwstppr a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 2381 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@sureshanaparti a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
Trillian test result (tid-3054)
|
|
@shwstppr Upload volume from URL lists disk offerings with name, whereas Upload volume from Local lists disk offerings with display name, please make them consistent. and When selecting other zone's disk offering in Upload volume from URL, it is not throwing access permission error (which it shown earlier). |
|
Made UI change for your first issue Reverted access check |
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@sureshanaparti a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
|
@sureshanaparti @DaanHoogland I've refactored code changes to use @blueorangutan package |
|
@shwstppr a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 2419 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@sureshanaparti a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
Trillian test result (tid-3105)
|
Verified the UI changes, looks good. |
|
Tested upload from local and url with user and admin accounts with latest changes. Also, verified the access restriction on other zone's disk offering while uploading volume from url. LGTM. |
Description
Fixes #5696
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?