-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
Pr 1558 #1566
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Pr 1558 #1566
Conversation
make object accessibility optional
|
This looks like it duplicates most of #1558 Instead you should create a PR against my branch, otherwise I can't tell what you've added or changed. |
|
Thanks for the clarification!You're right — the PR was based on master, which makes the diff include most of #1558. |
|
I’ve split out the test into a separate commit and based it on |
|
There are still 37 files changed and 16 commits which can't be right. You likely want the PR to be against my branch (in my fork). |
|
Thanks for confirming — that makes sense. I double-checked the history and confirmed that the test-only commit is already |
|
There are still 37 files changed and 16 commits which can't be right. You likely want the PR to be against my branch (in my fork). |
I added a focused unit test (ReflectionDiffBuilderAccessibilityTest) to demonstrate that
ReflectionDiffBuilder still forces reflective access to private fields even when
force-access is disabled.
This test shows that ReflectionDiffBuilder has not yet been migrated to the opt-in
accessibility controls introduced via AbstractReflection in PR #1558, and still relies
on legacy forced reflection behavior.
The test is intentionally minimal and serves as executable evidence of the current
behavior discussed in LANG-1711.