Skip to content

Update scalacheck to 1.15.3#507

Merged
tuxji merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
scala-steward:update/scalacheck-1.15.3
Mar 17, 2021
Merged

Update scalacheck to 1.15.3#507
tuxji merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
scala-steward:update/scalacheck-1.15.3

Conversation

@scala-steward
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updates org.scalacheck:scalacheck from 1.14.3 to 1.15.3.
GitHub Release Notes - Changelog - Version Diff

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

Ignore future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "org.scalacheck", artifactId = "scalacheck" } ]

labels: library-update, semver-minor

@stevedlawrence
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

+1

  • Do all automated continuous integration checks pass?
    Yes
  • Is the update a patch, minor, or major update?
    Minor update, changelog doesn't mention anything that affects our minimal usage of scalacheck. Also verified that passera tests run, which is the only place scalacheck is used.
  • Is the license still compatible with ASF License Policy?
    Yes, BSD-3
  • Have any changes been made to LICENSE/NOTICE files that need to be incorporated?
    No changes to license type. No NOTICE file. Note that we do not include this license in any release artifcats because we do not distribute scalacheck.
  • Have any transitive dependencies been added or changed?
    No changes to transitive dependencies

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tuxji tuxji left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@tuxji tuxji merged commit fb60b69 into apache:master Mar 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants