Describe the bug
Test cases:
select array_position(haystack, needle, index_from)
from values
([1, 2], 1, 2),
([1, 2], 1, null)
t(haystack, needle, index_from)
- Currently this fails because
0 is out of bounds, but this is only because by default the value underneath a null is usually 0; we can construct an array where this isn't the case and pass in a valid in-bounds value even if it should be masked by a null
- This should instead fail by checking nulls, as scalar path also raises exec error if it detects a null for the index argument
> select array_position(haystack, needle), array_positions(haystack, needle)
from values
([[1], null], null),
([[]], null)
t(haystack, needle);
+-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
| array_position(t.haystack,t.needle) | array_positions(t.haystack,t.needle) |
+-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
| NULL | [] |
| 1 | [1] |
+-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
- This should return
2 | [2] for the first row and NULL | [] for the second row
- This is because in the first row, we can find a null element so we return that position
- And for the second row we can't find any null, so we shouldn't return a position
To Reproduce
No response
Expected behavior
No response
Additional context
No response
Describe the bug
Test cases:
0is out of bounds, but this is only because by default the value underneath a null is usually 0; we can construct an array where this isn't the case and pass in a valid in-bounds value even if it should be masked by a null2 | [2]for the first row andNULL | []for the second rowTo Reproduce
No response
Expected behavior
No response
Additional context
No response