Prepend sqllogictest explain result with line number

[duongcongtoai]

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #9443.

Rationale for this change

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?

Are there any user-facing changes?

[my-vegetable-has-exploded]

I think ci maybe happy after add feature avro.
I don't know whether INCLUDE_TPCH=true cargo test --test sqllogictests --feature avro or INCLUDE_TPCH=true cargo test --test sqllogictests --all-features would works?

[duongcongtoai]

Hi @my-vegetable-has-exploded , could you help me review these small changes, conflict is most likely to happen but i know how to deal with it now ;)

[my-vegetable-has-exploded]

Hi @my-vegetable-has-exploded , could you help me review these small changes, conflict is most likely to happen but i know how to deal with it now ;)

I am not sure the specifics of the problem at hand. For branch conflicts, I think it is okay to merge or rebase it and regenerate the sqllogicaltests.

Thanks for your work. @duongcongtoai

[duongcongtoai]

I am not sure the specifics of the problem at hand. For branch conflicts, I think it is okay to merge or rebase it and regenerate the sqllogicaltests.

The current generated output matches main now, i think it is good to review

[alamb]

Thanks @duongcongtoai and @my-vegetable-has-exploded -- this looks awesome.

We may be able to make the diffs even easier to check if we can remove the ---

[alamb]

I wonder if we can remove the ---- stuff now

Maybe we could remove the --- and see if the test diff look better 🤔

Not in this PR

[duongcongtoai]

Hi @alamb look like only you can merge it :D

[alamb]

Thanks again @duongcongtoai and @my-vegetable-has-exploded -- I merged up this PR from main and re-ran CI tests just to be sure we didn't introduce any logical conflicts and it all looks good to me. Thanks agian!