Skip to content

Conversation

@jayzhan211
Copy link
Contributor

@jayzhan211 jayzhan211 commented Aug 26, 2024

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #.

Rationale for this change

I realize I didn't call non-nested kernel (vectorized) for non-nested type. So did the one in in-list

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?

Are there any user-facing changes?

Others

I didn't run the benchmark. If anyone has concern about the actual performance, I could run the benchmark

Signed-off-by: jayzhan211 <jayzhan211@gmail.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the physical-expr Changes to the physical-expr crates label Aug 26, 2024
@jayzhan211 jayzhan211 marked this pull request as ready for review August 26, 2024 02:41
Signed-off-by: jayzhan211 <jayzhan211@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me -- thank you @jayzhan211 and I apologize for the delay in reviewing

@jayzhan211
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @alamb

@jayzhan211 jayzhan211 merged commit 83ca713 into apache:main Sep 7, 2024
@jayzhan211 jayzhan211 deleted the non-nested-kernel branch September 7, 2024 05:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

physical-expr Changes to the physical-expr crates

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants