fix: Implement Substrait consumer support for like_match, like_imatch, and negated variants

[Nithurshen]

Which issue does this PR close?

• Closes [substrait] [sqllogictest] Unsupported function name: "like_match", "like_imatch", "like_not_match" and "like_not_imatch" #16293

Rationale for this change

Currently, DataFusion fails to consume Substrait plans that utilize like_match, like_imatch, or their negated variants (like_not_match, like_not_imatch). This results in a panic with DataFusion error: This feature is not implemented: Unsupported function name: "like_match" during round-trip planning.

This PR implements the missing mapping logic in the Substrait consumer to correctly translate these function names into DataFusion Expr::Like expressions.

What changes are included in this PR?

• Updated BuiltinExprBuilder in scalar_function.rs to recognize:
  • like_match (LIKE)
  • like_imatch (ILIKE)
  • like_not_match (NOT LIKE)
  • like_not_imatch (NOT ILIKE)
• Modified the internal build_like_expr helper to accept a negated boolean flag (previously hardcoded to false).
• Added a new unit test test_like_match_conversion to verify the correct conversion of these functions and their arguments.

Are these changes tested?

Yes. I added a new unit test test_like_match_conversion in datafusion/substrait/src/logical_plan/consumer/expr/scalar_function.rs.

This test explicitly constructs Substrait plans for like_match and like_not_match and asserts that they are consumed into correct DataFusion Expr::Like variants with the appropriate negated and case_insensitive flags.

Note: Verification was done via unit test rather than the standard sqllogictest suite because predicates.slt was experiencing unrelated environment-specific failures locally.

Are there any user-facing changes?

• No breaking changes.
• Users relying on Substrait round-trips for LIKE/ILIKE expressions will now see these queries succeed instead of failing.

[milenkovicm]

thanks @Nithurshen PR makes sense

[Nithurshen]

@milenkovicm, Can we merge this PR as all the tests have passed.

[milenkovicm]

lets leave time for others to comment.
maybe @gabotechs would like to have a look as he opened original issue

[gabotechs]

Looks good, thanks @Nithurshen for the PR and @milenkovicm for the review!