Skip to content

Theta and Tuple sketch setops sync with Java#252

Merged
AlexanderSaydakov merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
theta_setops_sync_java
Dec 10, 2021
Merged

Theta and Tuple sketch setops sync with Java#252
AlexanderSaydakov merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
theta_setops_sync_java

Conversation

@AlexanderSaydakov
Copy link
Contributor

ported tests from Java, adjusted logic

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 1, 2021

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1551528232

  • 4 of 4 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 92.656%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1423399130: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 2170
Relevant Lines: 2342

💛 - Coveralls

template<typename FwdSketch, typename Sketch>
CS theta_set_difference_base<EN, EK, CS, A>::compute(FwdSketch&& a, const Sketch& b, bool ordered) const {
if (a.is_empty() || a.get_num_retained() == 0 || b.is_empty()) return CS(a, ordered);
if (a.is_empty() || (a.get_num_retained() > 0 && b.is_empty())) return CS(a, true);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CS(a, true) will return a sorted compact sketch regardless of the value of the ordered input parameter. Not really wrong with a CompactSketch, but depending on usage it may force an unnecessary sort.

@leerho leerho self-requested a review December 10, 2021 20:41
Copy link
Member

@leerho leerho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@AlexanderSaydakov AlexanderSaydakov merged commit 9fbcb9c into master Dec 10, 2021
@AlexanderSaydakov AlexanderSaydakov deleted the theta_setops_sync_java branch December 10, 2021 21:37
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 23, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1523456119

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

Details

  • 4 of 4 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+5.2%) to 97.904%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1423399130: 5.2%
Covered Lines: 7428
Relevant Lines: 7587

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants