[Bug] [dolphinscheduler-datasource-api] There are two jmod issues in this module

[106umao]

Search before asking

• I had searched in the issues and found no similar issues.

What happened

Running org.apache.dolphinscheduler.plugin.datasource.api.utils.CommonUtilsTest#testLoadKerberosConf method in jdk11 has some jmod issues.

PowerMockito.mockStatic(UserGroupInformation.class) method leads to the following bug
Bug Info:

java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
	at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedSerializationConstructorAccessor5.newInstance(Unknown Source)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:490)
	at org.objenesis.instantiator.sun.SunReflectionFactoryInstantiator.newInstance(SunReflectionFactoryInstantiator.java:48)
	at org.objenesis.ObjenesisBase.newInstance(ObjenesisBase.java:73)
	at org.mockito.internal.creation.instance.ObjenesisInstantiator.newInstance(ObjenesisInstantiator.java:21)
	at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.SubclassByteBuddyMockMaker.createMock(SubclassByteBuddyMockMaker.java:48)
	at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.ByteBuddyMockMaker.createMock(ByteBuddyMockMaker.java:29)
	at org.powermock.api.mockito.mockmaker.PowerMockMaker.createMock(PowerMockMaker.java:41)
	at org.mockito.internal.util.MockUtil.createMock(MockUtil.java:53)
	at org.mockito.internal.MockitoCore.mock(MockitoCore.java:62)
	at org.mockito.Mockito.mock(Mockito.java:1951)
	at org.powermock.api.mockito.internal.mockcreation.DefaultMockCreator.createMethodInvocationControl(DefaultMockCreator.java:108)
	at org.powermock.api.mockito.internal.mockcreation.DefaultMockCreator.doCreateMock(DefaultMockCreator.java:61)
	at org.powermock.api.mockito.internal.mockcreation.DefaultMockCreator.createMock(DefaultMockCreator.java:53)
	at org.powermock.api.mockito.internal.mockcreation.DefaultMockCreator.mock(DefaultMockCreator.java:40)
	at org.powermock.api.mockito.PowerMockito.mockStatic(PowerMockito.java:62)
	at org.apache.dolphinscheduler.plugin.datasource.api.utils.CommonUtilsTest.testLoadKerberosConf(CommonUtilsTest.java:67)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethod.invoke(TestMethod.java:68)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:326)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie$2.run(MethodRoadie.java:89)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(MethodRoadie.java:97)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:310)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTestInSuper(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:131)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.access$100(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:59)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner$TestExecutorStatement.evaluate(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:147)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.evaluateStatement(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:107)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:82)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:298)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTest(MethodRoadie.java:87)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.run(MethodRoadie.java:50)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.invokeTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:218)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.runMethods(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:160)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$1.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:134)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:34)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:44)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:136)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.run(JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.java:117)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.run(AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.java:57)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner.run(PowerMockRunner.java:59)
	at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:137)
	at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:68)
	at com.intellij.rt.junit.IdeaTestRunner$Repeater.startRunnerWithArgs(IdeaTestRunner.java:33)
	at com.intellij.rt.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:230)
	at com.intellij.rt.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:58)
Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InaccessibleObjectException: Unable to make protected java.lang.Class jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(java.lang.String,boolean) throws java.lang.ClassNotFoundException accessible: module java.base does not "opens jdk.internal.loader" to unnamed module @7d907bac
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:340)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkCanSetAccessible(AccessibleObject.java:280)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.checkCanSetAccessible(Method.java:198)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.setAccessible(Method.java:192)
	at org.powermock.reflect.internal.WhiteboxImpl.doGetAllMethods(WhiteboxImpl.java:1508)
	at org.powermock.reflect.internal.WhiteboxImpl.getAllMethods(WhiteboxImpl.java:1482)
	at org.powermock.reflect.internal.WhiteboxImpl.getMethods(WhiteboxImpl.java:1750)
	at org.powermock.reflect.internal.WhiteboxImpl.getMethods(WhiteboxImpl.java:1789)
	at org.powermock.reflect.internal.WhiteboxImpl.getBestMethodCandidate(WhiteboxImpl.java:1008)
	at org.powermock.core.MockInvocation.findMethodToInvoke(MockInvocation.java:58)
	at org.powermock.core.MockInvocation.init(MockInvocation.java:35)
	at org.powermock.core.MockInvocation.<init>(MockInvocation.java:22)
	at org.powermock.core.MockGateway.doMethodCall(MockGateway.java:155)
	at org.powermock.core.MockGateway.methodCall(MockGateway.java:138)
	at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.getOsPrincipalClass(UserGroupInformation.java:404)
	at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.<clinit>(UserGroupInformation.java:412)
	... 48 more

CommonUtils.loadKerberosConf(new Configuration()) method causes the following problem

java.lang.IllegalAccessError: class javax.xml.parsers.FactoryFinder (in unnamed module @0x7a45d714) cannot access class jdk.xml.internal.SecuritySupport (in module java.xml) because module java.xml does not export jdk.xml.internal to unnamed module @0x7a45d714

	at javax.xml.parsers.FactoryFinder.<clinit>(FactoryFinder.java:69)
	at javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance(DocumentBuilderFactory.java:140)
	at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResource(Configuration.java:2516)
	at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.loadResources(Configuration.java:2492)
	at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getProps(Configuration.java:2405)
	at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.set(Configuration.java:1143)
	at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.set(Configuration.java:1115)
	at org.apache.dolphinscheduler.plugin.datasource.api.utils.CommonUtils.loadKerberosConf(CommonUtils.java:92)
	at org.apache.dolphinscheduler.plugin.datasource.api.utils.CommonUtils.loadKerberosConf(CommonUtils.java:60)
	at org.apache.dolphinscheduler.plugin.datasource.api.utils.CommonUtilsTest.testLoadKerberosConf(CommonUtilsTest.java:68)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethod.invoke(TestMethod.java:68)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:326)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie$2.run(MethodRoadie.java:89)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(MethodRoadie.java:97)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:310)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTestInSuper(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:131)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.access$100(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:59)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner$TestExecutorStatement.evaluate(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:147)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.evaluateStatement(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:107)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:82)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:298)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTest(MethodRoadie.java:87)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.run(MethodRoadie.java:50)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.invokeTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:218)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.runMethods(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:160)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$1.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:134)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:34)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:44)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:136)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.run(JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.java:117)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.run(AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.java:57)
	at org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner.run(PowerMockRunner.java:59)
	at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:137)
	at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:68)
	at com.intellij.rt.junit.IdeaTestRunner$Repeater.startRunnerWithArgs(IdeaTestRunner.java:33)
	at com.intellij.rt.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:230)
	at com.intellij.rt.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:58)

What you expected to happen

passed

How to reproduce

Run the mvn test -e

Anything else

JDK Version : JDK 9+

Version

dev

Are you willing to submit PR?

• Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
  Already mentioned pr [Fix] Fix the jmod issues, support 11 and later versions #10232 #10239 , will add content in this pr

Related to an issue #10232

[github-actions]

Thank you for your feedback, we have received your issue, Please wait patiently for a reply.

• In order for us to understand your request as soon as possible, please provide detailed information、version or pictures.
• If you haven't received a reply for a long time, you can join our slack and send your question to channel #troubleshooting

[SbloodyS]

Currently only support jdk8 in dolphinscheduler. There are many places to adapt, not just unit test. I think we should open a discussion if you want to support another version of jdk.

[106umao]

Currently only support jdk8 in dolphinscheduler. There are many places to adapt, not just unit test. I think we should open a discussion if you want to support another version of jdk.

I saw the official developer interface prompting support for jdk1.8+ when I raised the issue a few days ago, and then encountered some jmod problems in the process of using 11, and mentioned a pr by the way. This issue is also about jmod, so I want to relate it to the pr I mentioned before. Since the CI of that pr is a bit of a problem, I'd like to temporarily update the official documentation to guide developers on how to develop on the jdk9+ version.

[SbloodyS]

You can submit a pr to change the incorrect description of jdk1.8+ to jdk1.8. But we did not support jdk9 right now.

[106umao]

You can submit a pr to change the incorrect description of jdk1.8+ to jdk1.8. But we did not support jdk9 right now.

I saw it last week and now it has been changed. But I pr have done a lot of work on jmod.

[SbloodyS]

You can submit a pr to change the incorrect description of jdk1.8+ to jdk1.8. But we did not support jdk9 right now.

I saw it last week and now it has been changed. But I pr have done a lot of work on jmod.

You can continue your PR in #10239. There is no conflict between two of them.

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity for 30 days. It will be closed in next 7 days if no further activity occurs.