[Improve][ut]Refactor SqlExecutorTest

[bingexxx]

运行 SqlExecutorTest 测试类的时候报错，应该是没有拉起spring 服务，请问是缺少了什么注解吗？

[CalvinKirs]

This UT is marked with @ignore. If you are interested, you can refactor it. It is recommended to use the mock form and only test the SqlExecutor method.

[whitelowrie]

Please use english!!!
and you can write the test like this before you configured correctly

@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
@ContextConfiguration(classes={DependencyConfig.class, SpringApplicationContext.class, SpringZKServer.class,
        NettyExecutorManager.class, ExecutorDispatcher.class, ZookeeperRegistryCenter.class, TaskPriorityQueueConsumer.class,
        ZookeeperNodeManager.class, ZookeeperCachedOperator.class, ZookeeperConfig.class, MasterConfig.class})
public class MyTest {

    @Autowired
    private ProcessService processService = null;

    @Test
    public void test01(){
        System.out.println(processService);
    }
}

recommended the mock , you can write the test like this

@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.Silent.class)
public class MyTestMock {
    @Autowired
    private ProcessService processService = null;
    @Before
    public void init(){
        processService = mock(ProcessService.class);
    }
    @Test
    public void test01(){
        System.out.println(">>>>>>>>>>>>>" + processService.getUserById(1));
    }
}

[CalvinKirs]

Please use english!!!
and you can write the test like this before you configured correctly

@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
@ContextConfiguration(classes={DependencyConfig.class, SpringApplicationContext.class, SpringZKServer.class,
        NettyExecutorManager.class, ExecutorDispatcher.class, ZookeeperRegistryCenter.class, TaskPriorityQueueConsumer.class,
        ZookeeperNodeManager.class, ZookeeperCachedOperator.class, ZookeeperConfig.class, MasterConfig.class})
public class MyTest {

    @Autowired
    private ProcessService processService = null;

    @Test
    public void test01(){
        System.out.println(processService);
    }
}

We hope to adopt the mock form, because ut should remain relatively independent. Are you interested in refactoring this UT?

[bingexxx]

OK, thanks

[whitelowrie]

@CalvinKirs
Sure，I can do this.