[Improvement-13570][Resource Center] Code clean up for old resource

[Radeity]

Purpose of the pull request

• This PR closes [Improvement][Resource Center] Code clean up and replace the usage of Resource #13570
• Mainly do some code cleanup.

Brief change log

• Remove authorization of resource and udf in Security Center.
• Remove use of ResourceMapper.
• Remove code for compatibility with old resource.

Verify this pull request

This pull request is code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This pull request is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(or)

If your pull request contain incompatible change, you should also add it to docs/docs/en/guide/upgrede/incompatible.md

[Radeity]

Hi, @caishunfeng , i modify code logic in StreamTaskExecuteRunnable.getResourceFullNames which keep the same with implementation of getResourceFullNames in TaskExecutionContextFactory, would you like to help check whether there's something wrong?

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #14074 (088254f) into dev (f1e7862) will decrease coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 9.09%.

❗ Current head 088254f differs from pull request most recent head a67c9c7. Consider uploading reports for the commit a67c9c7 to get more accurate results

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                dev   #14074      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     38.41%   38.35%   -0.06%     
+ Complexity     4476     4416      -60     
============================================
  Files          1228     1222       -6     
  Lines         42733    42042     -691     
  Branches       4727     4618     -109     
============================================
- Hits          16417    16127     -290     
+ Misses        24504    24143     -361     
+ Partials       1812     1772      -40     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...nscheduler/api/controller/ResourcesController.java	50.00% <ø> (-3.71%)	⬇️
...duler/api/controller/TaskDefinitionController.java	3.12% <ø> (+0.26%)	⬆️
...lphinscheduler/api/controller/UsersController.java	51.78% <ø> (-3.22%)	⬇️
...permission/ResourcePermissionCheckServiceImpl.java	99.13% <ø> (+0.67%)	⬆️
...heduler/api/service/impl/ResourcesServiceImpl.java	44.15% <ø> (+0.45%)	⬆️
...er/api/service/impl/TaskDefinitionServiceImpl.java	43.75% <ø> (-0.30%)	⬇️
...scheduler/api/service/impl/UdfFuncServiceImpl.java	67.25% <ø> (ø)
...inscheduler/api/service/impl/UsersServiceImpl.java	72.19% <ø> (+1.40%)	⬆️
...erver/master/runner/StreamTaskExecuteRunnable.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...er/runner/execute/TaskExecutionContextFactory.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 1 more

... and 46 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[sonarqubecloud]

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarCloud.

[sonarqubecloud]

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
3 Code Smells

17.6% Coverage
0.0% Duplication

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity for 120 days. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs.

[github-actions]

This pull request has been closed because it has not had recent activity. You could reopen it if you try to continue your work, and anyone who are interested in it are encouraged to continue work on this pull request.