Revert "Fix the bug Edit User Info will always shows failed."

[chengshiwen]

Reverts #5627

New bug introduced and solution #5627 is unreasonable

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #5698 (bed5605) into dev (b31ba7e) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                dev    #5698      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     45.36%   45.35%   -0.02%     
+ Complexity     3688     3687       -1     
============================================
  Files           607      607              
  Lines         24855    24855              
  Branches       2825     2825              
============================================
- Hits          11275    11272       -3     
- Misses        12498    12499       +1     
- Partials       1082     1084       +2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...er/master/dispatch/host/assign/RandomSelector.java	77.77% <0.00%> (-5.56%)	⬇️
...olphinscheduler/plugin/alert/email/MailSender.java	72.91% <0.00%> (-1.39%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b31ba7e...bed5605. Read the comment docs.

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication

[echohlne]

@chengshiwen Sorry for the trouble bring to you, my modification is based on 2 known issues:

1. When we open the user information page, the enable/disable status of current user would always shows empty

----so I add this:

this.state = this.item.state

2. If the user has not configured a tenant yet, if he just want to modify his personal information, It would always occurs an error, the main reason is shown as the note:
   

   // If the user has not configured a tenant yet, this.item.tenantId would be 0, the if check returns false
   // so I try to add a new check like this: if (this.item.tenantId || this.item.tenantId === 0) 
   if (this.item.tenantId) {
   	this.tenantId = this.item.tenantId
   }

It's my fault that I did not explain clearly the reason for my modification in pr #5627
when I submit the pr, I've verified all the scenarios I know. I'm not sure what's the new bug you said ? If a bug is introduced, I am very sorry, hoping for your reply. 😛