[Feature-8369][Document]Add docs building test instructions in pydolphinscheduler DEVELOP.md

[EricGao888]

• This pr adds instructions on how to build pydolphinscheduler docs locally in DEVELOP.md. With such instructions, developers could make sure docs could be built successfully and will not block the remote CI. As discussed in [Feature-8222][python] move examples into the scope of source package #8340 this comment
• This pr closes: [Feature][Document] Add doc building test instruction in pydolphinscheduler DEVELOP.md #8369

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #8693 (4eb8bb7) into dev (e00727c) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                dev    #8693      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     40.21%   40.22%   +0.01%     
- Complexity     4375     4377       +2     
============================================
  Files           817      817              
  Lines         32676    32676              
  Branches       3637     3637              
============================================
+ Hits          13140    13144       +4     
+ Misses        18306    18304       -2     
+ Partials       1230     1228       -2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...e/dolphinscheduler/remote/NettyRemotingClient.java	53.52% <0.00%> (+2.81%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e00727c...4eb8bb7. Read the comment docs.

[zhongjiajie]

I add some suggestion about it

[EricGao888]

I add some suggestion about it

I've resolved all the comments. CI is failing because Sonar Cloud server cannot be reached. Could you please take a look at it? Thx! @zhongjiajie

[zhongjiajie]

I restart the failed test, it almost because of the random error

[sonarqubecloud]

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
3 Code Smells

8.9% Coverage
14.4% Duplication

[EricGao888]

I restart the failed test, it almost because of the random error

@zhongjiajie I think it looks good now. The coverage and duplicate stuff reported by SonarCloud Code Analysis seems not related to this pr.

[zhongjiajie]

LGTM. Thanks and nice to see you again

[EricGao888]

LGTM. Thanks and nice to see you again

Cool, thx for help with review : )