Skip to content

[fix] correct restore_reset_index_id example value in CCR config doc#3680

Merged
morningman merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
boluor:fix-ccr-config-reset-index-id
May 19, 2026
Merged

[fix] correct restore_reset_index_id example value in CCR config doc#3680
morningman merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
boluor:fix-ccr-config-reset-index-id

Conversation

@boluor
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@boluor boluor commented May 19, 2026

Summary

In the CCR config doc (admin-manual/data-admin/ccr/config.md), the "FE Configuration" example showed:

restore_reset_index_id = true

This contradicts the rest of the same doc — the parameter reference table and the "Common Tuning Combinations" table both say restore_reset_index_id should be false for synced tables with inverted/bitmap indexes. The FE default is also false (verified against Config.java: public static boolean restore_reset_index_id = false). No scenario in the doc recommends true.

Changed the example value to false. Applied across all affected versions: EN (next + 2.1/3.x/4.x) and Chinese (next + 2.1/3.x/4.x).

Test plan

  • Verified the FE default restore_reset_index_id = false against apache/doris Config.java
  • Confirmed the parameter table and tuning table in the same doc both say false

The FE Configuration example showed `restore_reset_index_id = true`,
contradicting the rest of the doc: the parameter table and the tuning
combinations table both say it should be `false` for synced tables with
inverted/bitmap indexes, and the FE default is `false` (verified against
Config.java). Changed the example to `false`. Applied across all
affected EN and Chinese versions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@morningman morningman merged commit 18e86da into apache:master May 19, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants