Skip to content

[doc] zh release-3.1.0: add missing H4 groupings under Federated Analytics#3773

Merged
morningman merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
boluor:translate-release-3.1.0-zh
May 25, 2026
Merged

[doc] zh release-3.1.0: add missing H4 groupings under Federated Analytics#3773
morningman merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
boluor:translate-release-3.1.0-zh

Conversation

@boluor
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@boluor boluor commented May 25, 2026

Summary

The zh `release-3.1.0.md` page covered all four feature items under `### 联邦分析` but did not carry the two H4 groupings that the EN page uses to organise them:

  • `#### 1. More Flexible Data Lake Rest Catalog Support` — groups the Iceberg / Paimon REST Catalog items
  • `#### 2. More Powerful Hadoop Ecosystem Support` — groups the multi-Kerberos and multi-Hadoop environment items

Add the two H4 headings (`#### 1. 数据湖 Rest Catalog 支持更灵活` and `#### 2. Hadoop 生态支持更强`) in zh so the section nesting matches EN. No bullet content changes — the existing four bold-tagged items now sit under the right grouping.

Other H3 structure across this page (VARIANT subsections, Inverted Index, Storage Engine, Query Performance, Feature Improvements, Behavioral Changes) already aligns with EN.

Test plan

  • `grep '^####'` in the zh page now returns the two new H4s in the Lakehouse section

…ytics

The zh page covered all four feature items under "联邦分析" but did
not carry the two H4 groupings that the EN page uses to organise them:

- `#### 1. More Flexible Data Lake Rest Catalog Support` — groups the
  Iceberg / Paimon REST Catalog items
- `#### 2. More Powerful Hadoop Ecosystem Support` — groups the multi-
  Kerberos and multi-Hadoop environment items

Add the two H4 headings in zh so the section nesting matches EN. No
bullet content changes; the existing four bold-tagged items now sit
under the right grouping.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@morningman morningman merged commit 517795f into apache:master May 25, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants