[enhance](information_schema) show hll type and bitmap type instead of unknown#12519
Merged
yiguolei merged 2 commits intoapache:masterfrom Sep 13, 2022
Merged
Conversation
ByteYue
force-pushed
the
enhance_schema_information
branch
from
1d23476 to
f4dd5bc
Compare
morningman
reviewed
Sep 11, 2022
Contributor
morningman
left a comment
morningman
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM,
but please add regression test for this case
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
Issue Number: close #xxx
Problem summary
Before this pr, when querying data type of hll/bitmap column, 'unknown' would be returned instead of the correct data type of queried column. Details are as followed:
This pr aims to return the correct data type.
Checklist(Required)
Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...