[bug](jdbc) fix jdbc insert decimalv3 be core dump#16353
Merged
HappenLee merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom Feb 3, 2023
Merged
[bug](jdbc) fix jdbc insert decimalv3 be core dump#16353HappenLee merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
HappenLee merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
Contributor
|
Could you add regression test case? |
Contributor
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
github-actions
bot
added
approved
Contributor
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
Contributor
|
TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
morningman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2023
dutyu
pushed a commit
to dutyu/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
*** Query id: bd140aca583140d9-aa826a4ce54283d6 ***
*** Aborted at 1675233072 (unix time) try "date -d @1675233072" if you are using GNU date ***
*** Current BE git commitID: fdb6eff ***
*** SIGSEGV unkown detail explain (@0x0) received by PID 1771670 (TID 1771894 OR 0x7f98dc05c700) from PID 0; stack trace: ***
0# doris::signal::(anonymous namespace)::FailureSignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) at /mnt/disk1/ftw/projects/doris/be/src/common/signal_handler.h:428
1# os::Linux::chained_handler(int, siginfo*, void*) in /mnt/disk1/ftw/tools/jdk1.8.0_131/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so
2# JVM_handle_linux_signal in /mnt/disk1/ftw/tools/jdk1.8.0_131/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so
3# signalHandler(int, siginfo*, void*) in /mnt/disk1/ftw/tools/jdk1.8.0_131/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so
4# 0x00007F9938A11C20 in /lib64/libpthread.so.0
5# doris::vectorized::DataTypeNullable::to_string[abi:cxx11](doris::vectorized::IColumn const&, unsigned long) const at /mnt/disk1/ftw/projects/doris/be/src/vec/data_types/data_type_nullable.cpp:48
6# doris::TableConnector::convert_column_data(COWdoris::vectorized::IColumn::immutable_ptrdoris::vectorized::IColumn const&, std::shared_ptr<doris::vectorized::IDataType const> const&, doris::TypeDescriptor const&, int, doris::TOdbcTableType::type) at /mnt/disk1/ftw/projects/doris/be/src/exec/table_connector.cpp:279
7# doris::TableConnector::append(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits, std::allocator > const&, doris::vectorized::Block*, std::vector<doris::vectorized::VExprContext*, std::allocatordoris::vectorized::VExprContext* > const&, unsigned int, unsigned int*, doris::TOdbcTableType::type) at /mnt/disk1/ftw/projects/doris/be/src/runtime/types.h:39
8# doris::vectorized::VJdbcTableSink::send(doris::RuntimeState*, doris::vectorized::Block*, bool) at /mnt/disk1/ftw/projects/doris/be/src/vec/sink/vjdbc_table_sink.cpp:83
9# doris::PlanFragmentExecutor::open_vectorized_internal() at /mnt/disk1/ftw/projects/doris/be/src/runtime/plan_fragment_executor.cpp:298
10# doris::PlanFragmentExecutor::open() at /mnt/disk1/ftw/projects/doris/be/src/runtime/plan_fragment_executor.cpp:241
11# doris::FragmentExecState::execute() at /mnt/disk1/ftw/projects/doris/be/src/runtime/fragment_mgr.cpp:250
12# doris::FragmentMgr::_exec_actual(std::shared_ptrdoris::FragmentExecState, std::function<void (doris::RuntimeState*, doris::Status*)>) at /mnt/disk1/ftw/projects/doris/be/src/runtime/fragment_mgr.cpp:490
13# std::_Function_handler<void (), doris::FragmentMgr::exec_plan_fragment(doris::TExecPlanFragmentParams const&, std::function<void (doris::RuntimeState*, doris::Status*)>)::{lambda()#1}>::_M_invoke(std::_Any_data const&) at /mnt/disk1/ftw/tools/ldb_toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/std_function.h:291
14# doris::ThreadPool::dispatch_thread() at /mnt/disk1/ftw/projects/doris/be/src/util/threadpool.cpp:543
15# doris::Thread::supervise_thread(void*) at /mnt/disk1/ftw/projects/doris/be/src/util/thread.cpp:454
16# start_thread in /lib64/libpthread.so.0
17# __GI___clone in /lib64/libc.so.6
Issue Number: close #xxx
Problem summary
Describe your changes.
Checklist(Required)
Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...