Skip to content

Comments

[bugfix](exchange node) should not depend on eos to judge the ending of stream receiver#16600

Merged
yiguolei merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
yiguolei:fix_bug
Feb 10, 2023
Merged

[bugfix](exchange node) should not depend on eos to judge the ending of stream receiver#16600
yiguolei merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
yiguolei:fix_bug

Conversation

@yiguolei
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed changes

This bug is introduced by #16412.

It will not cause data error. but profile is wrong.
image

If the block is the last block meet limit, eos == true, but the block is not empty. And the block is not added to profile.

Problem summary

Describe your changes.

Checklist(Required)

  1. Does it affect the original behavior:
    • Yes
    • No
    • I don't know
  2. Has unit tests been added:
    • Yes
    • No
    • No Need
  3. Has document been added or modified:
    • Yes
    • No
    • No Need
  4. Does it need to update dependencies:
    • Yes
    • No
  5. Are there any changes that cannot be rolled back:
    • Yes (If Yes, please explain WHY)
    • No

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

Copy link
Contributor

@Gabriel39 Gabriel39 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit 75847f7 into apache:master Feb 10, 2023
YangShaw pushed a commit to YangShaw/doris that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2023
…of stream receiver (apache#16600)

[bugfix](exchange node) should not depend on eos to judge the ending of stream receiver apache#16600

Co-authored-by: yiguolei <yiguolei@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants