-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
[fix](nereids) Fix use aggregate mv wrongly when rewrite query which only contains join #30858
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. |
79f4614 to
4d373e5
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
run buildall |
Contributor
Author
|
run buildall |
morrySnow
previously approved these changes
Feb 5, 2024
Contributor
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
Contributor
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
Contributor
Author
|
run buildall |
Contributor
Author
|
run buildall |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 37503 ms |
keanji-x
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2024
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 181604 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 30.88 s |
|
Load test result on machine: 'aliyun_ecs.c7a.8xlarge_32C64G' |
morrySnow
approved these changes
Feb 6, 2024
Contributor
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
yiguolei
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2024
…only contains join (#30858) the materialized view def is as following: > select > o_orderdate, > o_shippriority, > o_comment, > l_orderkey, > o_orderkey, > count(*) > from > orders > left join lineitem on l_orderkey = o_orderkey > group by o_orderdate, > o_shippriority, > o_comment, > l_orderkey; the query should rewrite success by using above materialized view > select > o_orderdate, > o_shippriority, > o_comment, > l_orderkey, > ps_partkey, > count(*) > from > orders left > join lineitem on l_orderkey = o_orderkey > left join partsupp on ps_partkey = l_orderkey > group by > o_orderdate, > o_shippriority, > o_comment, > l_orderkey, > ps_partkey;
yiguolei
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2024
…only contains join (#30858) the materialized view def is as following: > select > o_orderdate, > o_shippriority, > o_comment, > l_orderkey, > o_orderkey, > count(*) > from > orders > left join lineitem on l_orderkey = o_orderkey > group by o_orderdate, > o_shippriority, > o_comment, > l_orderkey; the query should rewrite success by using above materialized view > select > o_orderdate, > o_shippriority, > o_comment, > l_orderkey, > ps_partkey, > count(*) > from > orders left > join lineitem on l_orderkey = o_orderkey > left join partsupp on ps_partkey = l_orderkey > group by > o_orderdate, > o_shippriority, > o_comment, > l_orderkey, > ps_partkey;
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
the materialized view def is as following:
the query should rewrite success by using above materialized view
Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...