Skip to content

[test](case) add partition prune cases#44722

Merged
morrySnow merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
feiniaofeiafei:add_partition_prune_cases
Dec 3, 2024
Merged

[test](case) add partition prune cases#44722
morrySnow merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
feiniaofeiafei:add_partition_prune_cases

Conversation

@feiniaofeiafei
Copy link
Contributor

@feiniaofeiafei feiniaofeiafei commented Nov 28, 2024

What problem does this PR solve?

This pr adds some partition prune cases.

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@doris-robot
Copy link

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@feiniaofeiafei
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@feiniaofeiafei feiniaofeiafei force-pushed the add_partition_prune_cases branch from 35ec250 to b577747 Compare November 28, 2024 07:02
@feiniaofeiafei
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Dec 2, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@morrySnow morrySnow merged commit e16dbe5 into apache:master Dec 3, 2024
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
starocean999 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2024
Related PR: #44722

Problem Summary:
ENABLE_FOLD_CONSTANT_BY_BE is fuzzy, when ENABLE_FOLD_CONSTANT_BY_BE is
true, some cases will fail.
dataroaring pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
Cherry-picked from #44722

Co-authored-by: feiniaofeiafei <moailing@selectdb.com>
feiniaofeiafei added a commit to feiniaofeiafei/doris that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
feiniaofeiafei added a commit to feiniaofeiafei/doris that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
yiguolei pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2024
feiniaofeiafei added a commit to feiniaofeiafei/doris that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2024
Related PR: apache#44722

Problem Summary:
ENABLE_FOLD_CONSTANT_BY_BE is fuzzy, when ENABLE_FOLD_CONSTANT_BY_BE is
true, some cases will fail.
feiniaofeiafei added a commit to feiniaofeiafei/doris that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2024
Related PR: apache#44722

Problem Summary:
ENABLE_FOLD_CONSTANT_BY_BE is fuzzy, when ENABLE_FOLD_CONSTANT_BY_BE is
true, some cases will fail.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. dev/2.1.8-merged dev/3.0.4-merged reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants