Skip to content

Conversation

@924060929
Copy link
Contributor

cherry pick from #52870

the CTE use MultiCastDataSink.destinations to store the destination instead of FragmentExecParams.destinations, but the old Coordinator use FragmentExecParams.destinations for local shuffle, so throw the exception:
```
[CANCELLED]Rows mismatched! Data may be lost. [Expected enqueue rows=14, Real enqueue rows=0, Detail: Type: HASH_SHUFFLE, Local Exchange Id: -10, Shuffled Map: [0:6], ]
```
@924060929 924060929 requested a review from dataroaring as a code owner July 7, 2025 08:00
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@924060929
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@924060929
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@924060929 924060929 changed the title [fix](coordinator) fix cte with local shuffle throw exception (#52870) branch-3.0: [fix](coordinator) fix cte with local shuffle throw exception (#52870) Jul 8, 2025
@924060929 924060929 changed the title branch-3.0: [fix](coordinator) fix cte with local shuffle throw exception (#52870) branch-3.0: [fix](coordinator) fix cte with local shuffle throw exception #52870 Jul 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@dataroaring dataroaring left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dataroaring dataroaring merged commit 6bb784a into apache:branch-3.0 Jul 9, 2025
23 of 26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants