Skip to content

Conversation

@seawinde
Copy link
Contributor

@seawinde seawinde commented Nov 24, 2025

picked from #57558

apache#57558)

Related PR: apache#49514 apache#56958

Problem Summary:

In the scenario of nested materialized view rewriting, if the underlying
materialized view is a partitioned materialized view, the rewriting of
the upper-level materialized view would fail. This PR fixes the issue.
@seawinde seawinde requested a review from morrySnow as a code owner November 24, 2025 03:30
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@seawinde
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

FE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 72.73% (8/11) 🎉
Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

@morrySnow morrySnow changed the title branch-3.1:[fix](mtmv) Fix nested mv rewritten fail when bottom mv is partitioned (#57558) branch-3.1:[fix](mtmv) Fix nested mv rewritten fail when bottom mv is partitioned #57558 Nov 25, 2025
@seawinde
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

FE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 72.73% (8/11) 🎉
Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

@morrySnow morrySnow merged commit 8866161 into apache:branch-3.1 Nov 26, 2025
22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants