Skip to content

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Cherry-picked from #59113

For instance, only contains object stores:

```
2025-12-16 15:32:25,112 WARN (cloud instance check|62) [CloudInstanceStatusChecker.runAfterCatalogReady():72] get instance from ms exception java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 0
	at java.base/java.util.Collections$EmptyList.get(Collections.java:4586)
	at com.google.protobuf.LazyStringArrayList.get(LazyStringArrayList.java:97)
	at com.google.protobuf.LazyStringArrayList.get(LazyStringArrayList.java:38)
	at [org.apache.doris.cloud.proto.Cloud](http://org.apache.doris.cloud.proto.cloud/)$InstanceInfoPB.getStorageVaultNames(Cloud.java:8104)
	at org.apache.doris.cloud.catalog.CloudInstanceStatusChecker.syncStorageVault(CloudInstanceStatusChecker.java:90) 
	at org.apache.doris.cloud.catalog.CloudInstanceStatusChecker.runAfterCatalogReady(CloudInstanceStatusChecker.java:68) 
	at org.apache.doris.common.util.MasterDaemon.runOneCycle(MasterDaemon.java:58) 
	at org.apache.doris.common.util.Daemon.run(Daemon.java:119)
```
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from yiguolei as a code owner December 25, 2025 10:53
@Thearas
Copy link
Contributor

Thearas commented Dec 25, 2025

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@dataroaring dataroaring reopened this Dec 25, 2025
@Thearas
Copy link
Contributor

Thearas commented Dec 25, 2025

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

FE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 0.00% (0/2) 🎉
Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor Author

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions github-actions bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. reviewed labels Dec 26, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor Author

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit d991ff2 into branch-4.0 Dec 26, 2025
24 of 27 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the auto-pick-59113-branch-4.0 branch December 26, 2025 10:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants