Skip to content

branch-4.1: [Feature](func) Support table function json_each, json_each_text #60910#61794

Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intobranch-4.1from
auto-pick-60910-branch-4.1
Open

branch-4.1: [Feature](func) Support table function json_each, json_each_text #60910#61794
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intobranch-4.1from
auto-pick-60910-branch-4.1

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Cherry-picked from #60910

)

doc: apache/doris-website#3422

```text
Doris> SELECT k, v
    -> FROM (SELECT 1) dummy
    -> LATERAL VIEW json_each('{"a":"foo","b":"bar"}') t AS k, v;
+------+-------+
| k    | v     |
+------+-------+
| a    | "foo" |
| b    | "bar" |
+------+-------+
2 rows in set (0.01 sec)

Doris> SELECT k, v
    -> FROM (SELECT 1) dummy
    -> LATERAL VIEW json_each_text('{"a":"foo","b":"bar"}') t AS k, v;
+------+------+
| k    | v    |
+------+------+
| a    | foo  |
| b    | bar  |
+------+------+
2 rows in set (0.01 sec)
```
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from yiguolei as a code owner March 27, 2026 03:06
@Thearas
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thearas commented Mar 27, 2026

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@dataroaring dataroaring reopened this Mar 27, 2026
@Thearas
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thearas commented Mar 27, 2026

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

FE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 10.34% (6/58) 🎉
Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants