Skip to content

branch-4.1:[fix](parquet)fix parquet write timestamp int96 type. (2/2) (#61832)#62319

Merged
yiguolei merged 1 commit intoapache:branch-4.1from
hubgeter:pick_41_arrow_int96_fix_3
Apr 11, 2026
Merged

branch-4.1:[fix](parquet)fix parquet write timestamp int96 type. (2/2) (#61832)#62319
yiguolei merged 1 commit intoapache:branch-4.1from
hubgeter:pick_41_arrow_int96_fix_3

Conversation

@hubgeter
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@hubgeter hubgeter commented Apr 10, 2026 •
edited
Loading

bp #61832

What problem does this PR solve?

Problem Summary:
pick #61832 again, since #62119 reverted the changes made to #61847.

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:

  • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
    - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason

  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.

  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.

  • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason

  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.

  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@hubgeter
branch-4.1:[fix](parquet)fix parquet write timestamp int96 type. (2/2) (
1431717 
apache#61832) (apache#61847)

bp apache#61832
### What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

### Release note

None

### Check List (For Author)

- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
    - [ ] Regression test
    - [ ] Unit Test
    - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
        - [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
        - [ ] No code files have been changed.
        - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason?  -->

- Behavior changed:
    - [ ] No.
    - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->

- Does this need documentation?
    - [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
apache/doris-website#1214 -->

### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
@hubgeter hubgeter requested a review from yiguolei as a code owner April 10, 2026 06:08
@Thearas
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thearas commented Apr 10, 2026

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@hubgeter
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

hubgeter commented Apr 10, 2026

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

hello-stephen commented Apr 10, 2026

BE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 0.00% (0/1) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 52.96% (19873/37524)
Line Coverage 36.52% (187164/512517)
Region Coverage 32.86% (145417/442530)
Branch Coverage 33.96% (63653/187431)

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

hello-stephen commented Apr 10, 2026

BE Regression && UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 100.00% (1/1) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 71.35% (26207/36731)
Line Coverage 54.30% (277363/510800)
Region Coverage 51.69% (230785/446474)
Branch Coverage 53.02% (99652/187957)

1 similar comment
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

hello-stephen commented Apr 10, 2026

BE Regression && UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 100.00% (1/1) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 71.35% (26207/36731)
Line Coverage 54.30% (277363/510800)
Region Coverage 51.69% (230785/446474)
Branch Coverage 53.02% (99652/187957)

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit 682bcdc into apache:branch-4.1 Apr 11, 2026
27 of 28 checks passed
kaka11chen pushed a commit to kaka11chen/doris that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2026
@hubgeter @kaka11chen
branch-4.1:[fix](parquet)fix parquet write timestamp int96 type. (2/2) (
363ff5d 
apache#61832) (apache#62319)

bp apache#61832
### What problem does this PR solve?
Problem Summary:
pick apache#61832 again, since apache#62119 reverted the changes made to apache#61847.

### Release note

None

### Check List (For Author)

- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
    - [ ] Regression test
    - [ ] Unit Test
    - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been
changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->

- Behavior changed:
    - [ ] No.
    - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->

- Does this need documentation?
    - [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
apache/doris-website#1214 -->

### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->

### What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

### Release note

None

### Check List (For Author)

- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
    - [ ] Regression test
    - [ ] Unit Test
    - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
        - [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
        - [ ] No code files have been changed.
        - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason?  -->

- Behavior changed:
    - [ ] No.
    - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->

- Does this need documentation?
    - [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
apache/doris-website#1214 -->

### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR
should merge into -->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@yiguolei yiguolei yiguolei approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@hubgeter @Thearas @hello-stephen @yiguolei