Skip to content

branch-4.0: [fix](fe) Fix remote Flight SQL result receiver initialization #63136#63154

Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
branch-4.0from
auto-pick-63136-branch-4.0
Open

branch-4.0: [fix](fe) Fix remote Flight SQL result receiver initialization #63136#63154
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
branch-4.0from
auto-pick-63136-branch-4.0

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Cherry-picked from #63136

Problem Summary: Arrow Flight SQL queries that return results from BE do
not create local result receivers. The old coordinator still initialized
ResultReceiverConsumer with an empty receiver list, which failed with
ArrayBlockingQueue(0), and the new coordinator still created unnecessary
local receivers for remote result mode.

### Release note

Fix Arrow Flight SQL query execution when results are returned from BE.

### Check List (For Author)

- Test: Unit Test
    - Ran org.apache.doris.qe.ResultReceiverConsumerTest
    - Ran FE checkstyle for fe-core
- Behavior changed: No
- Does this need documentation: No

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

run buildall

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants