Skip to content

branch-4.1: [fix](load) rebuild broker load storage properties after Gson replay #63094#63177

Merged
yiguolei merged 1 commit into
branch-4.1from
auto-pick-63094-branch-4.1
May 13, 2026
Merged

branch-4.1: [fix](load) rebuild broker load storage properties after Gson replay #63094#63177
yiguolei merged 1 commit into
branch-4.1from
auto-pick-63094-branch-4.1

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Cherry-picked from #63094

…63094)

### What problem does this PR solve?

Problem Summary:

Broker load jobs may fail after FE restart, image load, or edit log
replay in cloud mode.

`StorageDesc.storageProperties` is not persisted by Doris's Gson
configuration, so after deserialization
the `BrokerDesc` inside `BrokerLoadJob` can keep `storageType` and raw
`properties` but lose the
derived `storageProperties` object. When the pending task later tries to
create a filesystem and list
source files, FE cannot reconstruct the expected storage backend state
and the load may fail with
errors such as `Unknown storage type`.

This PR fixes the issue by rebuilding `storageProperties` from
`storageType`, `name`, and `properties`
after Gson replay, and also lazily reinitializing it on access as a
safety net.
@github-actions github-actions Bot requested a review from yiguolei as a code owner May 12, 2026 11:03
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

FE Regression Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 50.00% (7/14) 🎉
Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

@yiguolei
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

skip buildall

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit 6c774aa into branch-4.1 May 13, 2026
32 of 34 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label May 13, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants