Skip to content

branch-4.0: [fix](mv) Avoid unioning query-unused MV partitions #63081#63707

Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
branch-4.0from
auto-pick-63081-branch-4.0
Open

branch-4.0: [fix](mv) Avoid unioning query-unused MV partitions #63081#63707
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
branch-4.0from
auto-pick-63081-branch-4.0

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Cherry-picked from #63081

Problem Summary:

In MV union rewrite, rewrittenPlanUsePartitionNameSet may contain extra
MV partitions outside the query range. For example, the query only uses
{p20260401, p20260402, p20260403}, but the rewritten MV scan may select
partitions from p20260301 to p20260428. The old compensation logic
mapped all removed MV partitions back to base table partitions and added
them into baseTableNeedUnionPartitionNameSet. This created unnecessary
base table union branches, increased the MV candidate cost, and could
make explain show MaterializedViewRewriteSuccessButNotChose.

---------

Co-authored-by: yangtao555 <yangtao555@jd.com>
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

run buildall

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants