Skip to content

branch-4.0: [fix](transaction) select txn insert backend from current cluster #63634#63951

Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
branch-4.0from
auto-pick-63634-branch-4.0
Open

branch-4.0: [fix](transaction) select txn insert backend from current cluster #63634#63951
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
branch-4.0from
auto-pick-63634-branch-4.0

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

Cherry-picked from #63634

…3634)

### What problem does this PR solve?

Problem Summary:

In cloud mode with multiple compute groups, transactional `insert into
values` may fail with:

`Cannot invoke "org.apache.doris.system.Backend.getHost()" because
"backend" is null`

The root cause is that `InsertStreamTxnExecutor` selected a backend id
from all clusters through `selectBackendIdsByPolicy(policy, 1)`, but
then looked up the selected id from `getBackendsByCurrentCluster()`. If
the selected backend belonged to another compute group, the lookup
returned null and FE hit an NPE when calling `backend.getHost()`.

This PR changes txn insert backend selection to use the current cluster
backend snapshot as the candidate list, so the selected backend is
always from the current compute group.
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

FE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 62.50% (5/8) 🎉
Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants