Skip to content

branch-4.0: [fix](filecache) add async lru update machanism and fix partial hit in cache reader #61083#63957

Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
branch-4.0from
auto-pick-61083-branch-4.0
Open

branch-4.0: [fix](filecache) add async lru update machanism and fix partial hit in cache reader #61083#63957
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
branch-4.0from
auto-pick-61083-branch-4.0

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

Cherry-picked from #61083

…n cache reader (#61083)

- CachedRemoteFileReader::read_at_impl has incorrect initialization of
subsequent traversal start point and count after direct partial hit
(causes incorrect fallback / extra overhead)
- Proposed LRU ordering async update solution: Decoupled LRU update from
query read operations, slightly reducing read lock latency and laying
groundwork for subsequent lock splitting
- Established performance unit tests for cache lock

Signed-off-by: zhengyu <zhangzhengyu@selectdb.com>
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

run buildall

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants