Skip to content

fix iceberg reader#64142

Merged
Gabriel39 merged 2 commits into
apache:refact_reader_branchfrom
Gabriel39:debug_0604
Jun 5, 2026
Merged

fix iceberg reader#64142
Gabriel39 merged 2 commits into
apache:refact_reader_branchfrom
Gabriel39:debug_0604

Conversation

@Gabriel39
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

Gabriel39 added 2 commits June 5, 2026 09:57
### What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary: Add explicit debug string helpers for the table reader mapping path so reader state, schema mapping, scan request projection, predicate localization, and current file context can be inspected when diagnosing schema evolution and nested column reads.

### Release note

None

### Check List (For Author)

- Test: Manual test
    - Ran git diff --check.
    - Attempted ./run-be-ut.sh --run --filter='TableColumnMapperTest.*:TableReaderTest.*', but local thirdparty dependencies are incomplete: thirdparty/installed/bin/protoc is missing and Snappy could not be found under thirdparty/installed.
- Behavior changed: No
- Does this need documentation: No
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@Gabriel39 Gabriel39 merged commit f0975d5 into apache:refact_reader_branch Jun 5, 2026
9 of 14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants