[fix](regression) stabilize colocate column order plan test#64940
Merged
hello-stephen merged 1 commit intoJul 1, 2026
Conversation
Contributor
|
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Please clearly describe your PR:
|
07032a5 to
cc17f94
Compare
Collaborator
Author
|
run buildall |
englefly
approved these changes
Jul 1, 2026
Contributor
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
Contributor
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
Pin
parallel_pipeline_task_num=1in the three-tabletest_colocate_join_of_column_orderexplain query.The case already waits for
group_column_order3to become stable, but Cloud P0 history still shows intermittentHAS_COLO_PLAN_NODE: false/INNER JOIN(PARTITIONED)after the wait. The detailed failures share the same plan shape: the first join is planned as a partitioned shuffle, so its output no longer keeps theNATURALhash distribution needed by the second join's colocate check.This is driven by physical-plan selection rather than statistics readiness. One sampled failure already executed
ALTER TABLE ... SET STATSand still produced the sameINNER JOIN(PARTITIONED)plan. Pinningparallel_pipeline_task_num=1removes the bucket-shuffle downgrade nondeterminism while preserving the original colocate planner coverage.Testing
git diff --check -- regression-test/suites/correctness_p0/test_colocate_join_of_column_order.groovy